Do Star Trek Actors Get Residuals? This is The Reality

Gene Roddenberry’s “Star Trek” might happen in a post-capitalist utopia whereby no character longs for wealth, however right here in our society, its actors can’t stay with that luxurious. 

Trekkies will have the ability to let you know that “Star Trek” wasn’t an enormous hit when it first aired from 1966 to 1969. It undoubtedly had a small and passionate cluster of followers, and the present was saved from cancelation no less than as soon as due to a concerted letter-writing marketing campaign, however it was by no means a top-10 kind of present within the rankings. “Star Trek” would not turn into a cultural phenomenon till it started airing in reruns within the mid-Nineteen Seventies. By then, it was extra broadly accessible, new superfans emerged, and “Star Trek” conventions grew to become a factor. Gene Roddenberry appeared at these conventions, and he started to relitigate his personal present, with fan encouragement, realizing that he had certainly created a utopian textual content. 

The celebs of “Star Trek,” in the meantime, had been in a position to leverage their restricted earnings from the present into conference appearances, as they weren’t getting any cash in residuals. As unfair as it could appear, the unique forged members of the collection — William Shatner, Leonard Nimoy, Nichelle Nichols, DeForest Kelley, George Takei, Walter Keonig, and James Doohan — did not get any royalty funds for these Nineteen Seventies reruns. Doohan, in a 1979 interview with the Fort Value Star-Telegram (quoted by the Heroes & Icons web site), admitted that neither he nor his co-stars acquired a dime from “Star Trek” reruns after the yr 1971. In 2020, William Shatner stated on Twitter that he receives no royalties for something “Star Trek”-related earlier than 1973. 

Those that assume all TV stars had been in a position to stay excessive on the hog primarily based completely on residuals for infinite reruns must keep in mind that a lot of them had been stiffed out of stated residuals due to unfair contracts. 

Shatner’s above-mentioned Twitter beef noticed him arguing with a bitter fan about his private wealth. Shatner recalled that the late-Sixties weren’t a rosy time for working actors, because the assumed sample of royalty funds hadn’t turn into an trade commonplace. He wrote:

“Something earlier than 1973 (that features ‘Star Trek’ Unique Collection) does not pay a cent in royalties. So please do not suppose you personal me or I owe you one thing for watching. It does not work like that.” 

Shatner additionally talked about his lack of royalty funds on the Transporter Room 3 podcast, hosted by IGN (and reported on by The Hollywood Reporter), clarifying that in these days, no actor on any TV collection acquired residuals for reruns after a number of years. In any case, it was thought of most individuals assumed no TV present would proceed to air in reruns for various years anyway. As such, no studios bothered to write down any royalty-based contracts for any actors. Nobody may have predicted that “Star Trek” would strike a decades-long syndication deal that may maintain it on the air for actually a long time. 

Again within the Fort Value Star Telegram interview, Doohan famous that the unfair funds for the “Star Trek” forged was a motivating think about a widespread contract restructuring all through Hollywood. He stated that “Our state of affairs was what prompted the Display screen Actors Guild to alter the principles. […] Now, you receives a commission for all reruns.” That, after solely three years on the air.

On SAG’s personal web site, it’s written that royalties did not exist earlier than 1960. A profitable strike ultimately put royalties contracts into play, however sadly, retroactive funds weren’t a part of the negotiations, and studios didn’t need to pay royalties to actors in films launched earlier than 1960. Something made in 1960 and past, nevertheless, concerned residual funds.

It was in 1960 that SAG additionally lastly arrange a pension fund. For the following 14 years, nevertheless, TV stars had been nonetheless getting stiffed. “Reruns” had been nonetheless, it appears, a novel idea, or no less than an idea that studios had been prepared to disregard when it got here to paying royalties to their actors. Falling in step with Doohan’s and Shatner’s feedback, SAG “collectively negotiated the contract masking primetime dramatic programming on the foremost tv networks for the primary time” in 1974. 

In 1980, leisure unions needed to go on strike once more when studios tried to withhold royalties for dwelling video gross sales and for pay TV like cable. Certainly, one would possibly discover that the majority SAG or WGA strikes have been, all through its historical past, concerning the withholding of residuals. The union’s longest strike got here in 1988, and that was largely about how residuals for TV broadcasts in worldwide markets weren’t being paid. In 2007 and 2008, the unions went on strike once more after studios did not pay them residuals for on-line broadcasts. Each new expertise, it appears, is seen as a brand new means by studios to aim to stiff SAG members. 

This was actually true of the 2023 strikes, which had been about attempting to get residuals from the infamous Streaming Wars. Streaming companies, due to a precedent set by Netflix, by no means launched their viewership numbers, and did not really feel any urge to pay royalties to actors because of this. The unions had been in a position to negotiate a cost system, and likewise demanded that studios cease utilizing A.I. tech to scan their faces and use their photographs at no cost. The 2023 strikes had been the second-longest within the group’s historical past … by in the future.  

Fortunately, the “Star Trek: The Subsequent Technology” forged benefitted from these earlier strikes, and have been in a position to stay off residuals. Within the case of actor Wil Wheaton, who performed Wesley Crusher, it was all he had for years.